Best's Insurance Professionals and Claims Resource

Skip Navigation LinksHome > Attorneys Search > Company Display
Best's Recommended Insurance Attorneys
Subrogation
105 Burke Avenue, Suite E
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403Locate in Google Maps
Telephone: 910-256-3992
Fax: 910-256-3578
E-Mail: e-b@ennis-baynard.com
www.ebmmlawfirm.com
Practice Areas
About Us
High Profile Cases
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1327, Wrightsville Beach, NC 28480
Established: 1999

Practice Areas
  • Insurance Defense
  • Admiralty and Maritime Law
  • Appellate Practice
  • Arson
  • Automobile
  • Casualty
  • Construction Defect
  • Construction Law
  • Coverage Issues
  • Employment Practices
  • Examinations Under Oath
  • Fraud
  • Litigation
  • Personal Injury
  • Premises Liability
  • Product Liability
  • Property
  • State and Federal Courts
  • Subrogation
  • Trial Practice
Back To Top

About Us
The law firm of Ennis, Baynard, Morton, Medlin & Brown, P.A. provides high quality and aggressive trial work for our insurance carriers and self-insureds at cost effective rates. We have historically tried cases throughout North Carolina with our concentration in the southeastern part of the state.
Back To Top

High Profile Cases
Moore v. N.C. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company, 82 N.C.App. 616, 347 S.E. 2d 489 (1986); Bailey v. LeBeau, 79 N.C.App. 345, 339 S.E.2d 460, 318 N.C. 411 (1986); Pyco Supply Co., Inc. v. American Centennial Ins. Co., 85 N.C.App. 114, 354 S.E.2d 360 (1987); Jansen v. Collins, 92 N.C.App. 516, 374 S.E. 2d 641 (1988); Petteway v. South Carolina Insurance Company, 93 N.C.App. 776, 379 S.E. 2d 80 (1989); Kinlaw v. N.C. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company, 103 N.C.App. 69, 404 S.E. 2d 188 (1991); Laughinghouse v. State, ex. Rel. North Carolina Ports Railway Commission, 101 N.C. App. 375, Disc. review denied, 328 N.C. 732 (1991), Cert Denied, 502 U.S. 1029 (1992); Enzor v. N.C. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company, 123 N.C.App. 544, 473 S.E. 2d 638 (1996); Wilson v. Wilson, 121 N.C. App.292 (1996); Riggs v. Riggs, 124 N.C. App. 647 (1996); Maring v. Hartford Cas. Ins. Co., 126 N.C.App. 201, 484 S.E.2d 417 (1997); Williams v. Bowden, 128 N.C. App. 31, Disc. review denied, 348 N.C. 78 (1998); Robinson v. Leach, 133 N.C.App. 436, 514 S.E. 2d 567 (1999); Kinsey v. Spann, 139 N.C. App. 370 (2000); Moore v. Cincinnati Ins., 147 NC.App. 761, 556 S.E. 2d 682 (2001); Strickland v. Doe, 156 N.C. App. 292, Disc. review denied, 357 N.C. 169 (2003); Southern Fire & Cas. Co. v. Kirby’s Garage, Inc., 162 N.C.App. 124, 590 S.E.2d 1 (2004); Moquin v. Hedrick, 163 N.C.App. 345, 593 S.E.2d 435 (2004); Ales v. TA Loving Co., 163 N.C.App. 350, 593 S.E.2d 453 (2004); Revels v. Robeson County Board of Elections, 167 N.C.App. 358, 605 S.E.2d 219 (2004); Taylor v. Gore, 161 N.C.App. 300, 588 S.E.2d 51, pet. disc. rev. denied, 358 N.C. 380, 597 S.E.2d 775 (2004); Guarascio v. New Hanover Health Network, Inc., 163 N.C.App. 160, 592 S.E.2d 612, affirmed 358 N.C. 375, 597 S.E.2d 130 (2004); Parker v. Willis, 167 N.C.App. 625, 606 S.E.2d 184 (2004); Parker v. Willis, 167 N.C. App. 625, Disc. review denied, 359 N.C. 411 (2005); Lightner v. City of Wilmington, 498 F.Supp.2d 802 (EDNC 2007), affirmed 545 F.3d 260 (4th Cir. 2008); Hewett v. Weisser, 689 S.E.2d 408 (N.C.App. 2009); Kelly v Shoaf ,718 SE2d 423 (2011); Martin v. Kilauea Properties, LLC, 214 N.C. App. 185 (2011); Preis v. Yoas, 217 N.C. App. 196 (2011); Spooner v Clemmons, 718 SE2d 423 (2011) review denied 722 SE2d 788 (2012); Warrender v Gull Harbor Yacht Club, Inc., 747 S.E.2d 592 (2013); Graham v Jenkins, 772 S.E.2d 874 (2015); Fields v Fields, 776 S.E.2d 898 (2015)
Back To Top

(This firm also appears in the General Defense section of this publication)